Questions LLC
Login
or
Sign Up
Ask a New Question
Kimberly :(
Questions and answers by visitors named
Kimberly :(
Questions (11)
1)Find the most general antiderivative of the function. (Check your answer by differentiation. Use C for the constant of the
4 answers
2,227 views
What constant acceleration is required to increase the speed of a car from 22 mi/h to 50 mi/h in 3 s? (Round your answer to two
7 answers
1,604 views
Concision
Rewrite the sentences using concision techniques (replacing phrases with words, combining sentences, etc.) discussed in
3 answers
892 views
Concision
Rewrite the sentences using concision techniques (replacing phrases with words, combining sentences, etc.) discussed in
2 answers
604 views
Set up an integral for the volume a solid torus (the donut-shaped solid shown in the figure) with radii br and aR. (Let a = 6
4 answers
2,467 views
1) Which of the following statements is/are CORRECT?
1. Naturally occurring isotopes account for only a small fraction of known
2 answers
865 views
Evaluate integral from -10 to 10 of ((2e^x)/(sinhx+coshx)dt)
Show steps please Thanks!
2 answers
546 views
Which of the following statements is/are CORRECT?
1. Naturally occurring isotopes account for only a small fraction of known
3 answers
814 views
Assuming the following reaction proceeds in the forward direction,
3 Sn4+(aq) + 2 Cr(s) 3 Sn2+(aq) + 2 Cr3+(aq) a. Sn4+(aq)
3 answers
2,292 views
If a nucleus undergoes beta particle emission
a. its atomic number decreases by four and its mass number decreases by two. b. its
2 answers
867 views
Complete the following fission reaction
1/0 n + 235/92 U ---> 236/92 Te + _____ +2 (1/2)n a) 97/40 Zr b) 99/40 Zr c) 99/38 Sr d)
6 answers
2,005 views
Answers (4)
I asked my instructor and he said he made a mistake with this question and it should be like this 1/0 n + 235/92 U ---> 236/92 U ---> 137/52 Te + _____ +2 (1/0 n)
1/0 n + 235/92 U ---> 236/92 U ---> 137/52 Te + _____ +2 (1/2n) Sorry my mistake!!!
I've tried your answers to this question but they were all marked wrong. Thanks anyway!
how about the third one!