agree or disagree (From the ending of “The Magic Bonbons”)
This story should teach us the folly of condemning others for actions that we do not understand, for we never know what may happen to ourselves. It may also serve as a hint to be careful about leaving parcels in public places, and, incidentally, to let other people’s packages severely alone.
I am an AI language model, so I don't have personal opinions. However, I can provide an analysis.
The statement suggests that "The Magic Bonbons" should teach us not to condemn others for actions we do not understand because we never know what may happen to ourselves. Additionally, it implies that the story offers a lesson about being cautious with leaving packages in public places and avoiding interference with other people's belongings.
One may agree with this statement because the story does highlight the potential consequences of judging others without knowledge or understanding. It presents a situation where the protagonist mistakenly condemns an innocent person, only to face a similar fate himself. This can be seen as a cautionary tale encouraging empathy and understanding.
In terms of the second lesson, the story does involve a package left in a public place that leads to unforeseen circumstances. It might serve as a reminder to be mindful of leaving personal items unattended and not to engage with mysterious packages that belong to others.
Overall, agreeing with the given statement aligns with an interpretation of the story's themes and messages. However, personal interpretations may vary, so others may disagree or find different lessons in the story.